Just analyzing possibilities and cases From my perspective, I have so many plugins I am secured on every occasion (not including war of course). So it would be more economic when there is a time (maybe vacation in their real work) to dedicated month forĭisclaimer: I would like not to be considered to be a person who is subscription hater but as subscription lover either People especially hobbyists have often lots plugins on shelves not used, and many month without any gig to earn money (or no at all). So a person having all multitracks prepared could buy just 1 month to do needed job, so in such case cost would be 13$ for job done and for year. Probably assuming if that worked for somebody the person would consider buying bigger offer or more permanent if more orders from customers in horizon.Īnd maybe even more for home recording people who have no lots gigs but from time to time want to mix and publish their own things (let's say once per year).ġ month should be enough for mixing and mastering, when everything is recorded. I think this was their concept in a background for this offer. If no orders I am stopping subscription if any new orders I am buying again only 1 month for a gig. So I would pay just only for 1 month, do mix with those plugins, create processed stems, backup, sell mix to customer and done. So let's consider such case: I don't want to subscribe permanently or invest a lot in great plugins just need to create one mix and would find those plugins useful. They didn't think about year subscriptions only monthly so more random and occasional. I believe they built this offer for different purpose.
0 kommentar(er)
